Anxiolytic Effect of Polyherbal
Extracts on Rodents
A. Tamil Selvan1*, R. Suresh2, N. Siva
Subramanian1, M. Ramadevi1
1Department of
Pharmacology, Teegala Krishna Reddy College of
Pharmacy, Meerpet, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
2RVS
College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sulur,
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
*Corresponding Author E-mail: tamilselvanpharmacologist@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Background: Anxiety, unlike other
psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia or depression, is both an
emotional and a psychiatric disorder. It commonly co-exists with other clinical
conditions but can be diagnosed on the basis of symptoms and course of the
disease.
Objective: To study the anxiolytic activity of polyherbal
extract and to estimate the biogenic amines.
Materials and
Methods: The anxiolytic effect of polyherbal
extracts containing Leptadenia reticulata
roots (Asclepiadaceae), Mimusops elengi bark (Sapotaceae)
and Evolvulus alsinoides
Whole plant (Convolvulaceae) were studied in rodents.
Different animal models like elevated plus maze, stair case, and mirrored
chamber were used for assessing the anxiolytic
property of the polyherbal extracts.
Results: The results revealed that
ethanolic and acetone extract at the dose of 200mg/kg significantly produced anxiolytic action, in a same way to that of diazepam
(2mg/kg, p.o) standard drug, along with significant
entries responses in all the above experimental models used. Polyherbal extracts showed significant (p<0.001)
decreases in serotonin and norepinephrine in the
whole brain of rat. The dopamine level was significantly (p<0.001) increased
by the extracts. The extracts might potentially act by increased GABAnergic activation and/or by modulating the serotoninergic levels in the central nervous system.
Conclusion: Traditional system of medicine
using herbs in neuro disorders exhibit potent anxiolytic action in the above study.
KEYWORDS: Leptadenia reticulata, Mimusops
elengi, Evolvulus alsinoides, anxiolytic, polyherbal, diazepam.
INTRODUCTION:
Nature is the best combinatorial chemist
and possibly has answers to all diseases of mankind. Failure of some synthetic
drugs and its side effects have prompted many researches to go back to ancient
healing methods which use herbal medicines to give relief. Till now, natural
product compounds discovered from medicinal plants have provided numerous
clinically useful drugs. Four billion people or about 80% of the world’s
population uses herbal medicine as a part of health care1. Human
brain disorders range which includes Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease,
depression, epilepsy, schizophrenia, anxiety, Huntington’s disease etc.
Psychotherapeutics does not meet properly for therapeutics possibilities for
majority of patients with mental health problems but herbal remedies are
ultimate therapeutic hope for such patients2. Many synthetic drugs
because of many unwanted but unavoidable side effects have poor patient
compliance. Therefore herbal treatment is being preferred over conventional
treatments.
Much attention and so scope is drawn
towards herbal remedy of many brain disorders3. Anxiety affects one
eighth of the total population of the world and has become a very important
area of research interest in psychopharmacology during this decade. Folk
medicines have particular values and plants have long been used to treat
central nervous system disorders4. Leptadenia reticulata is a twining shrub with
yellowish colour and green colour
flower. Its leaves and roots are useful in cooling, nutritive, stimulant,
diuretic, galactogogue, cures eye diseases etc5. Mimusops elengi
is an ever green tree with creamy flowers and thick brown coloured
bark. They are useful in astringent action, dental ailments, cooling, brain
tonic, constipation etc6. Evolvulus alsinoides is
a shrub with more branched leaves useful in nervous exhaustion, memory loss, nootropic agent, improves brain function, concentration etc7.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Plant Material
Coarsely powdered materials of the plants Leptadenia reticulata
(rhizomes), Evolvulus alsinoides
(roots), were collected from SKM Siddha and Ayurvedha Company (India) Limited, Erode and Mimusops elengi
(bark) was procured from Chakrapani Ayurveda Clinic and Research Center, Jaipur.
Preparation of
plant extract
Equal amount of the weighed coarse powders
were used for the extraction by successive solvent extraction by Soxhlet
apparatus using various solvents. The powder was defatted with petroleum ether
and successively extracted with acetone and ethanol. Extract was filtered,
concentrated under reduced pressure, dried and the percentage yield was
calculated. Phytochemical test was performed to identify the phytoconstituents present in the extract8.
Animals
Swiss albino mice (male: 20-25gm) and rats
(200-220gm) were used in the present study. The animals were procured from Venkateshwara Enterprises, Bangalore, India. They were
provided normal diet and tap water ad libitum and
were exposed to 12-h light and 12-h dark cycle. The animals were acclimatized
to the laboratory conditions before experiments. Experimental protocol was
approved by Institutional Animal Ethical Committee. Care of the animals was
taken as per guidelines of the Committee for the purpose of Control and
Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA). Experiment was approved by
Institutional Animal Ethics Committee.
Toxicity study
Toxicity testing is of paramount importance
while screening drugs. Toxicity studies are conducted with the assumption that
man will behave in the same manner as the animals. The procedure was followed
by using OECD guidelines (Organization of Economic Corporation and Development)
423 (Acute toxic Class method). The method used defined doses (2000 mg/kg, p.o.) and results allow a substance to be ranked and
classified according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for classification
of chemical which cause acute toxicity. Three male mice 18-25 gm were used for
the study, since the herbal extracts are relatively non toxic, the starting
dose level of extracts were 5, 50, 300, 2000 mg/kg/bw/p.o. The drug was administered orally to mice which were
fasted 3- 4 hrs with water ad libitum before administration of the drug. Body
weights of the mice before and after treatment were noted. Any changes in skin
and eyes and mucous membrane and also respiratory, circulatory, autonomic, CNS,
motor activity, behavioural pattern were observed.
And also sign of tremors, convulsion, salivation, diarrhoea,
lethargy, sleep and coma were noted9.
Pharmacological
Screening10,
11, 12
Elevated plus maze
The plus maze was in the shape of a cross
or plus with two closed arms each with roof open measuring 30×5×20cm, extending
from a central region (5×5) running along a north-south axis and two open arms
each measuring 30×5 cm running east-west. The wooden apparatus was elevated to
a height of 50cm from the floor in a dimly illuminated room. Mice were placed
individually in the central area of the maze with open access to any arm. The
amount of time spent on and number of entries in both open and closed arms
whereas number of stretch attend postures and head dips in closed arms were
measured manually during the 5min test period. An arm entry was defined as all
four feet in the arm. Stretch attend posture was defined as mice stretching forward
and then retracting to original position from closed (protected) or open
(unprotected) arms. Head dipping is defined as mice protruding the head over
the edge of closed or open arms down towards the floor. The apparatus was
cleaned after each mouse was tested to remove any residue or odour. For the purpose of analysis, open arm stay was
quantified as the amount of time that the mouse spent in open and closed arm
(open/total×100) and open arm entries were quantified as the number of entries
in open and closed arm(closed×total×100).
Rats were treated with the extracts (200
mg/kg, p.o.) and vehicle for 7 days once daily p.o. and the last dose was given on the 7th day,
60 min before starting the experiment. The standard drug Diazepam was given at
a dose of 2 mg/kg, p.o. 60 min before starting the
experiment. After proper treatment each rat was placed at the walled region of
the maze with its head facing the open arm. During the 5 min experiment, the
behavior of the rat was recorded as time spent in open and closed arm and total
number of entries in open and closed arm. An arm entry was defined as the entry
of all four paws into the arm. After each trial, the elevated plus maze
apparatus was wiped clean with ethanol (10%) solution. Group-I: Animals
received distilled water (10ml/kg, p.o.), Group-II:
Animals received Diazepam (2mg/kg, p.o.), Group-III:
Animals received acetone extract, (200mg/kg,
p.o), Group-1V: Animals received acetone extract
(200mg/kg p.o.).
Stair case method
The staircase is composed of five identical steps 2.5 cm
high, 10 cm wide and 7.5 cm deep. The internal height of the walls is constant
along the whole length of the staircase. Each animal is used only once. At the
end of experimental period mice were placed individually on the floor of the
box with its back to the staircase. Total number of steps climbed and total
number of rearings were recorded over a period of 3
min. A step is considered to be climbed only if the mouse has placed all four
paws on the step.
Mice were treated with the extracts (200
mg/kg, p.o.) and vehicle for 7 days once daily p.o. and the last dose was given on the 7th day,
60 min before starting the experiment. The standard drug Diazepam was given at
a dose of 2 mg/kg p.o. 60 min before starting the
experiment. During the 5 min experiment, the behavior of the mice was recorded
as time spent in each step and total number of climbing’s in all steps. A climb
entry was defined as the entry of all four paws in the stair case. After each
trial, the stair case-maze apparatus was wiped clean with ethanol (10%)
solution. Group-I: Animals received distilled water (10 ml/kg, p.o.), Group-II: Animals received Diazepam (2mg/kg, p.o.), Group-III: Animals received acetone extract, (200mg/kg, p.o),
Group-1V: Animals received acetone extract (200mg/kg p.o.).
Mirror chamber
method
The apparatus consists of a mirrored cube open on one side
that is placed inside a square wooden box. The mirrored cube measuring 30cm on
a side is constructed of five pieces of mirrored glass with one mirrored side
and an opposite side painted dark brown. The three mirrored side panes, a top
pane and the floor pane faced the interior of the cube. The container box is
40×40×30.5cm.The mirrored cube is placed in the centre of the wooden container
to form a 5cm corridor that completely surrounded the mirror chamber. A mirror
is also placed on the container wall so that it faced the single open side of
the mirrored chamber. The other three walls of the container are painted dark
brown. Stop watch is use for recording the activity.
Mice were treated with the
extracts (200 mg/kg p.o.) and vehicle for 7 days once
daily p.o. and the last dose was given on the 7th
day, 60 min before starting the experiment. The standard drug Diazepam was
given at a dose of 2 mg/kg i.p. 60 min before
starting the experiment. After proper treatment each mice were placed at the
walled region of the apparatus with its head facing the chamber. During the 5
min experiment, the behavior of the mice was recorded as time spent in and out
and total number of entries into the chamber. An entry was defined as the entry
of all four paws into the chamber. After each trial, the mirror chamber
apparatus was wiped clean with ethanol (10%) solution. Animals were placed
individually in the chamber of mirrors at a fixed corner and start the stop
watch and the following parameters were noted for five minutes: 1. Latency to
enter the mirror chamber, i.e., the time in seconds for the first entry into
the chamber of mirrors, 2. Number of entries in mirror chamber during five
minutes, 3. Total time in seconds spent in the mirror chamber during the
5minute test period.
Neurotransmitter
estimation13
Rats were sacrificed quickly by using decapitor. The brains were rapidly removed and Tissue was
stored in –80° C till the homogenization. Extraction of 5-HT, dopamine and noradrenaline was carried. All estimations were done by
using spectrofluorphotometer (Model no: RF- 1501,
SHIMADZU). For the estimation of 5-HT, the extracted sample was acidified with
3N Hcl and their native fluorescence was measured at
295/535 nm with respect to blank.Noradrenaline was
estimated by adding 0.5 ml 2M pH 6.8 acetate buffer; 0.1 ml I2
solution; 0.15 ml 0.1 Na2S 2O3.5H 2O2;
and 0.2 ml alkaline ascorbic acid/ ethylenediamine
solution in a sequential order to 0.5 ml of extracted brain sample. The last
reagent alkaline ascorbic acid/ethylenediamine
solution is very viscous and must be thoroughly mixed. The final sample volume
was 1.45 ml. Maximal fluorescence was developed within about 35 min and
fluorescence was read at 400/510 nm with respect to blank. For estimating
dopamine, 0.5 ml 2M acetate buffer, pH 6.8 (the final pH was about 6.5); 0.1 ml
0.1 N I2 solution; 0.2 ml alkaline sodium sulphate/
EDTA solution; and 0.25 ml 1:1 glacial acetic acid/concentrated HCl reagents were added in sequential order to 0.5 ml of
extracted sample. The tubes were placed in boiling water bath for 45 min, after
which they were allowed to cool to room temperature before reading.
Fluorescence was read at 335/380 nm with respect to blank.
Statistical analysis
Results
were represented as mean+SEM. Data was analysed using a statistical package(Graph pad prism
version 3.00 to Windows, Graph pad software, San Diego, California, (USA).Comparison
between groups were made using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) a post-hoc
comparisons were performed using Tukey-multiple
comparison test.
RESULTS:
Elevated plus maze
Administration
of diazepam 2mg/kg significantly increased the amount the time spent in the
open arms and the percentage of open arm entries (p<0.001) compared to the
control group was mentioned in Table – 1. Acetone and ethanolic extract of polyherbs at the dose of 200mg/kg significantly increased
the time spent in the open arms.
Table – 1. Anxiolytic
activity by elevated plus maze method
|
S. No |
Treatment |
Time spent (s) |
Entries in open arm |
|
|
Open |
Closed |
|||
|
1 |
Control |
103.33±2.629 |
30.00± 2.066 |
26.00± 1.932 |
|
2 |
Diazepam (2mg/kg, p.o) |
119.167±2.857* |
17.833± 1.682* |
54.00± 1.549* |
|
3 |
Acetone extract (200mg/kg, p.o.) |
103.5± 2.062* |
18.667± 0.211* |
51.333± 1.333* |
|
4 |
Ethanolic extract (200mg/kg, p.o.) |
93.00± 1.983 |
24.667± 0.615 |
33.833± 0.833 |
n=6, Values are mean ± SEM.
Differences were assessed statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *(p<0.001)
Stair case test
Stair case maze was another
test for anxiety related behaviour that had been validated using different anxiolytics. In this method mouse explore a rectangular maze that has six steps. The
number of steps climbed and the rearing of the mice were recorded as
measurement of anxiolytics related behaviour.
Acetone and ethanolic extract
treated mice showed more step ups and rearing events compared with the standard
drug diazepam. The number of steps climbed and rearing was the primary index of
anxiolysis in this test was found to be significant
(p<0.001). The results were shown in Table-2.
Table – 2.Anxiolytic activity by
stair case method
|
S.No |
Treatment |
Climbing |
Rearings |
|
1 |
Control |
10.33±0.498 |
10.16±0.354 |
|
2 |
Diazepam (2mg/kg, p.o) |
5.5±0.490* |
2.16±0.179* |
|
3 |
Acetone extract (200mg/kg, p.o.) |
8.00±0.621* |
4.16±0.231* |
|
4 |
Ethanolic extract (200mg/kg, p.o.) |
6.83±0.378* |
3.16±0.231* |
n=6, Values are mean ± SEM.
Differences were assessed statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. *(p<0.001)
Table – 3. Anxiolytic
activity by mirrored chamber apparatus
|
S.No |
Treatment |
Latency of the first entry into the chamber(s) |
Total time spent inside the chamber(s) |
No of entries into the chamber |
|
1 |
Control |
14.297±0.505 |
12.772±0.804 |
5.167±0.703 |
|
2 |
Diazepam
(2mg/kg, p.o) |
0.195±0.016* |
21.113±0.425* |
2.667±0.333* |
|
3 |
Acetone
extract (200mg/kg, p.o.) |
0.222±0.009* |
35.773±1.092 |
4.833±0.307* |
|
4 |
Ethanolic
extract (200 mg/kg, p.o.) |
0.462±0.052* |
40.285±0.713 |
5.667±0.667* |
n=6, Values are mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed
statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s
test. *(p<0.001)
Table – 4. Estimation of biogenic amines
in axiolytic state
|
S.No |
Treatment |
Norepinephrine(ng/gm) |
Dopamine(ng/mg) |
5-HT(ng/gm) |
|
1 |
Control |
2.042±0.071 |
0.912±0.090 |
1.482±0.082 |
|
2 |
Diazepam (2mg/kg, p.o) |
1.172±0.042* |
0.528±0.071* |
2.225±0.093* |
|
3 |
Acetone extract (200mg/kg, p.o.) |
1.763±0.083* |
0.642±0.92* |
1.861±0.091* |
|
4 |
Ethanolic extract (200mg/kg, p.o.) |
1.321±0.051 |
0.638±0.89 |
1.970±0.051 |
n=6, Values are mean ± SEM. Differences were assessed
statistically using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s
test. *(p<0.001)
Mirror chamber method
In this method treatment with the extracts significantly (p<0.001)
shortened the latency to enter mirror per entry and increased average time
spent per entry in mirror chamber as compared to standard. Increased time spent
and number of entries was consistent with anxiolytic
activity. The decreased in aversion is the result of an anxiolytic
effect expressed by the increased time spent and entries. The primary index was
spatiotemporal in nature; it was reduced by anxiolytic
drugs and increased by anxiogenic compounds. The
decrease in time spent was another indication of reduced “decision making”
behaviour. Both parameters were accepted as reliable indicators of anxiety and
fearfulness. The results were shown in Table-3.
DISCUSSION:
The extractive value indicates the yield of
the extract obtained from the air dried plants powder by successive solvent
extraction by Soxhlet extraction. Their percentage yield shows the solubility
of the active principles in the organic solvents used based upon the polarity
nature. They are then identified and confirmed by the preliminary phytochemical evaluation. Percentage yield of acetone
extract was 25.2%W/W and the ethanolic extract was 20.4%W/W. The
extract which shows the presence of many phytoconstituents
were analysed instrumentally. The presence of the phytoconstituents like alkaloids, flavonoids,
carbohydrates, phytosterols, proteins&amino
acids, gums&mucilages and resins were responsible
for the typical pharmacological effects. The purpose of acute toxicity studies
was to determine the LD50 values which helps in determining the safe
dose range at which the drug can be used such that there is no harmful or
lethal effect on the animal. The LD50 determination was done in mice
by OECD guideline 423 and LD50 of extracts were determined
(infinity). In this study there was no toxicity/death were observed at the dose
of 2000mg/kg body weight in animals. The acute toxicity study showed that at
200mg/kg dose the extracts are safe for consumption and for medicinal uses. The
therapeutic dose of the drug was considered as 1/10th of the LD50
value. Hence, the therapeutic dose used for recording biological response was
200mg/kg, p.o for the extracts.
Benzodiazepines
have been extensively used for the last 40 years to treat several forms of
anxiety but due to their unwanted side effects, alternative treatment
strategies with favourable side effect profiles,
credible benefits and moderate costs of interests, especially in primary care
settings14. Medicinal plants are the good sources to find new
remedies for these disorders. In the search for an alternative more specific
and perhaps cost free therapy, research has been conducted to investigate
rational anxiolytic drugs as well as new
antidepressant principles. The effects of the acetone and ethanolic extract at
200mg/kg on EPM, stair case and mirror chamber tests were almost equivalent to
that of diazepam 2mg/kg. These observations clearly
indicate that polyherbs extract exerts anxiolytic activity15.
To enhance the
synergistic action of the herb treatment, the selected suitable herbs were
mixed in proper ratio and extracted. The results revealed the synergistic
action of the polyherbs, as they produced significant
anxiolytic action16. The phytoconstituents may act through the anxiolytic
potential of benzodiazepine/GABAA receptor related agents while
these chemical constituents have been reported to be responsible for anxiolytic and sedative effects observed in different plat extracts. The flavonoid apigenin to the central benzodiazepine receptor possesses
important anxiolytic action17. Despite the
fact that the substance with binding abilities was still unknown, leaving
undefined whether there was an antagonist or agonist relation upon the
receptors, the information was important because cholinergic neurons located in
the septum participate in mood states such as: waking up, the motivation and
vegetative function through nervous pathway that receive innervations from mescencephalic structures and the brain stem.
Anxiolytics are known to
exert their pharmacological action causing an increase in GABA content in brain
cerebral hemisphere. It was found that the extracts significantly enhanced the
brain GABA concentration which again was synergistic of an anxiolytic
action of the herbs. The extract changes the behavioural
action correlated to increase in GABA concentration in brain and related in
part to the highly sensitive benzodiazepine site of the GABA benzodiazepine
receptor chloride ionophore complex18.
Table – 4 represents the neurotransmitters level in rat brain after
administration of the acetone and ethanolic extracts. Norepinephrine
level was significantly (p<0.05) decreased in brain. A significant
(p<0.05) elevation of dopamine concentration was observed with the extract
treated animals. Serotonin concentration in brain of rats was significantly
decreased compared to control rats. Increased 5-HT activity has been linked to
anxiety19, 20.
In summary, the
acetone and ethanolic extract of Leptadenia reticulata roots (Asclepiadaceae),
Mimusops elengi
bark (Sapotaceae) and Evolvulus alsinoides Whole plant (Convolvulaceae) showed significant and potent anxiolytic activity. Further pharmacological and chemical
investigations are required to elucidate the exact mechanism of action of these
extracts to isolate the active principles responsible for such effects.
REFERENCES:
1.
Tapsell LC,
Health benefits of Herbs and Species: The past, present and future. Med J
Aust.1 (Aug-2006), 1702-2438.
2.
Reynolds EH, Brain and Mind a challenge
for WHO Lancet.2003; 361:1924-1925.
3.
Zhang ZJ. Therapeutic effect of herbal
extracts and constituents in animal model of psychiatric disorders, Life Science 2004; 75:1659-1699.
4.
Somers JM, Goldner
EM, Waraich P and Hsu L. Prevalence and incidence
studies of anxiety disorders a systematic review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry 2006; 51:100-113.
8.
Kokate CK.
Practical Pharmacognosy. 5th ed, Vallabh Prakasham Delhi 1991;
107-121.
9.
Prasanna
Krishna et al, Evaluation of Acute and Chronic toxicity studies of ethanolic
extract of Ficus glomerata L, International Journal of Pharmaceutical
Development and Technology, 1(2), 2011, 66-70.
10.
H.Gerhard Vogel,
Drug discovery and Evaluation, Pharmacological assays, Second edition. ISBN:
978-3-540-70995- 4.
12.
Kulkarni SK. Hand book of Experimental
Pharmacology, Vallabh Prakashan
Delhi 1999; 3:29-42.
13.
Bhattamisra et al, Anxiolytic
activity of Marsilea minuta Linn
in rodents, J. Herb. Med. Toxicol (2007), 1(1), 15-20.
14.
Ross LE and Mclean LM. Anxiety disorders
during pregnancy and the postpartum period a systematic review. J Clin Psychiatry
2006; 67:1285-1298.
15.
Tripathi KD, Essentials of Medical
Pharmacology. Jaypee Brothers Publishers, New Delhi 2003; 399-402.
17.
Weiss SM, Wadsorth
G, Utility of ethological analysis to overcome locomotor confounds in elevated plus maze models of
anxiety. Neuro Sci Behaviour Rev 1998;
2; 265-271.
19.
Visser SAG, Gladdines, WWFT, Van Der Graaf PH, Petlier LA and Danhof M. Neuroactive steroids
differ in potency but not in intrinsic efficacy at the GABA-A
receptor in vivo. J Pharmacol
Exp Ther 2002; 303:616-626.
20.
Holmes A, Murphy DL and Crawley JN.
Abnormal behavioral phenotypes of serotonin transporter knockout mice parallels
with human anxiety and depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003;
54:953–9.
Received
on 05.08.2014 Modified on 19.08.2014
Accepted
on 28.10.2014 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacognosy & Phytochem.
7(1): Jan.-Mar. 2015; Page 01-05
DOI: 10.5958/0975-4385.2015.00001.1